Figure 2-5
(A) Electron micrograph of a thin section of the Gram-positive M. lysodeikticus  showing the thick peptidoglycan cell wall (cw), underlying cytoplasmic  (plasma) membrane (cm), mesosome (m), and nucleus (n). (B)  Freeze-fractured Bacteriodes cell showing typical major convex  fracture faces through the inner (im) and outer (om) membranes. Bars = 1  µm; circled arrow in B indicates direction of shadowing.
Some bacteria form capsules, which constitute the  outermost layer of the bacterial cell and surround it with a relatively  thick layer of viscous gel. Capsules may be up to 10 µm thick. Some  organisms lack a well-defined capsule but have loose, amorphous slime  layers external to the cell wall or cell envelope. The α hemolytic Streptococcus mutans,  the primary organism found in dental plaque is able to synthesis a  large extracellular mucoid glucans from sucrose. Not all bacterial  species produce capsules; however, the capsules of encapsulated  pathogens are often important determinants of virulence. Encapsulated  species are found among both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.  In both groups, most capsules are composed of highmolecular-weight  viscous polysaccharides that are retained as a thick gel outside the  cell wall or envelope. The capsule of Bacillus anthracis (the causal agent of anthrax) is unusual in that it is composed of a γ-glutamyl polypeptide. Table 2-1  presents the various capsular substances formed by a selection of  Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. A plasma membrane stage is  involved in the biosynthesis and assembly of the capsular substances,  which are extruded or secreted through the outer wall or envelope  structures. Mutational loss of enzymes involved in the biosynthesis of  the capsular polysaccharides can result in the smooth-to-rough variation  seen in the pneumococci.
The capsule is not essential for viability. Viability is not affected when capsular polysaccharides are removed enzymatically from the cell surface. The exact functions of capsules are not fully understood, but they do confer resistance to phagocytosis and hence provide the bacterial cell with protection against host defenses to invasion.
The capsule is not essential for viability. Viability is not affected when capsular polysaccharides are removed enzymatically from the cell surface. The exact functions of capsules are not fully understood, but they do confer resistance to phagocytosis and hence provide the bacterial cell with protection against host defenses to invasion.
The Gram stain broadly differentiates bacteria into  Gram-positive and Gram-negative groups; a few organisms are consistently  Gram-variable. Gram-positive and Gram-negative organisms differ  drastically in the organization of the structures outside the plasma  membrane but below the capsule (Fig. 2-6):  in Gram-negative organisms these structures constitute the cell  envelope, whereas in Gram-positive organisms they are called a cell  wall.  
 Most  Gram-positive bacteria have a relatively thick (about 20 to 80 nm),  continuous cell wall (often called the sacculus), which is composed  largely of peptidoglycan (also known as mucopeptide or murein). In thick  cell walls, other cell wall polymers (such as the teichoic acids,  polysaccharides, and peptidoglycolipids) are covalently attached to the  peptidoglycan. In contrast, the peptidoglycan layer in Gram-negative  bacteria is thin (about 5 to 10 nm thick); in E. coli, the  peptidoglycan is probably only a monolayer thick. Outside the  peptidoglycan layer in the Gram-negative envelope is an outer membrane  structure (about 7.5 to 10 nm thick). In most Gram-negative bacteria,  this membrane structure is anchored noncovalently to lipoprotein  molecules (Braun's lipoprotein), which, in turn, are covalently linked  to the peptidoglycan. The lipopolysaccharides of the Gram-negative cell  envelope form part of the outer leaflet of the outer membrane structure.
Most  Gram-positive bacteria have a relatively thick (about 20 to 80 nm),  continuous cell wall (often called the sacculus), which is composed  largely of peptidoglycan (also known as mucopeptide or murein). In thick  cell walls, other cell wall polymers (such as the teichoic acids,  polysaccharides, and peptidoglycolipids) are covalently attached to the  peptidoglycan. In contrast, the peptidoglycan layer in Gram-negative  bacteria is thin (about 5 to 10 nm thick); in E. coli, the  peptidoglycan is probably only a monolayer thick. Outside the  peptidoglycan layer in the Gram-negative envelope is an outer membrane  structure (about 7.5 to 10 nm thick). In most Gram-negative bacteria,  this membrane structure is anchored noncovalently to lipoprotein  molecules (Braun's lipoprotein), which, in turn, are covalently linked  to the peptidoglycan. The lipopolysaccharides of the Gram-negative cell  envelope form part of the outer leaflet of the outer membrane structure.
The organization and overall dimensions of the outer membrane of the Gram-negative cell envelope are similar to those of the plasma membrane (about 7.5 nm thick). Moreover, in Gram-negative bacteria such as E. coli, the outer and inner membranes adhere to each other at several hundred sites (Bayer patches); these sites can break up the continuity of the peptidoglycan layer. Table 2-2 summarizes the major classes of chemical constituents in the walls and envelopes of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.
The basic differences in surface structures of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria explain the results of Gram staining. Both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria take up the same amounts of crystal violet (CV) and iodine (I). The CV-I complex, however, is trapped inside the Gram-positive cell by the dehydration and reduced porosity of the thick cell wall as a result of the differential washing step with 95 percent ethanol or other solvent mixture. In contrast, the thin peptidoglycan layer and probable discontinuities at the membrane adhesion sites do not impede solvent extraction of the CV-I complex from the Gram-negative cell. The above mechanism of the Gram stain based on the structural differences between the two groups has been confirmed by sophisticated methods of electron microscopy (see Ref. Bereridge and Daries). The sequence of steps in the Gram stain differentiation is illustrated diagrammatically in Figure 2-7. Moreover, mechanical disruption of the cell wall of Gram-positive organisms or its enzymatic removal with lysozyme results in complete extraction of the CV-I complex and conversion to a Gram-negative reaction. Therefore, autolytic wall-degrading enzymes that cause cell wall breakage may account for Gram-negative or variable reactions in cultures of Gram-positive organisms (such as Staphylococcus aureus, Clostridium perfringens, Corynebacterium diphtheriae, and some Bacillus spp.).
Figure 2-6
Note the complexity of the Gram-negative cell envelope (outer membrane, its hydrophobic lipoprotein anchor; periplasmic space).
The organization and overall dimensions of the outer membrane of the Gram-negative cell envelope are similar to those of the plasma membrane (about 7.5 nm thick). Moreover, in Gram-negative bacteria such as E. coli, the outer and inner membranes adhere to each other at several hundred sites (Bayer patches); these sites can break up the continuity of the peptidoglycan layer. Table 2-2 summarizes the major classes of chemical constituents in the walls and envelopes of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.
The basic differences in surface structures of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria explain the results of Gram staining. Both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria take up the same amounts of crystal violet (CV) and iodine (I). The CV-I complex, however, is trapped inside the Gram-positive cell by the dehydration and reduced porosity of the thick cell wall as a result of the differential washing step with 95 percent ethanol or other solvent mixture. In contrast, the thin peptidoglycan layer and probable discontinuities at the membrane adhesion sites do not impede solvent extraction of the CV-I complex from the Gram-negative cell. The above mechanism of the Gram stain based on the structural differences between the two groups has been confirmed by sophisticated methods of electron microscopy (see Ref. Bereridge and Daries). The sequence of steps in the Gram stain differentiation is illustrated diagrammatically in Figure 2-7. Moreover, mechanical disruption of the cell wall of Gram-positive organisms or its enzymatic removal with lysozyme results in complete extraction of the CV-I complex and conversion to a Gram-negative reaction. Therefore, autolytic wall-degrading enzymes that cause cell wall breakage may account for Gram-negative or variable reactions in cultures of Gram-positive organisms (such as Staphylococcus aureus, Clostridium perfringens, Corynebacterium diphtheriae, and some Bacillus spp.).
Unique features of almost all prokaryotic cells (except for Halobacterium halobium  and mycoplasmas) are cell wall peptidoglycan and the specific enzymes  involved in its biosynthesis. These enzymes are target sites for  inhibition of peptidoglycan synthesis by specific antibiotics. The  primary chemical structures of peptidoglycans of both Gram-positive and  Gram-negative bacteria have been established; they consist of a glycan  backbone of repeating groups of β1, 4-linked disaccharides of  β1,4-N-acetylmuramyl-N-acetylglucosamine. Tetrapeptides of  L-alanine-D-isoglutamic acid-L-lysine (or diaminopimelic acid)-n-alanine  are linked through the carboxyl group by amide linkage of muramic acid  residues of the glycan chains; the D-alanine residues are directly  cross-linked to the 𝛆-amino group of lysine or diaminopimelic acid on a  neighboring tetrapeptide, or they are linked by a peptide bridge. In S. aureus  peptidoglycan, a glycine pentapeptide bridge links the two adjacent  peptide structures. The extent of direct or peptide-bridge cross-linking  varies from one peptidoglycan to another. The staphylococcal  peptidoglycan is highly cross-linked, whereas that of E. coli is  much less so, and has a more open peptidoglycan mesh. The diamino acid  providing the 𝛆-amino group for cross-linking is lysine or  diaminopimelic acid, the latter being uniformly present in Gram-negative  peptidoglycans. The structure of the peptidoglycan is illustrated in Figure 2-8.  A peptidoglycan with a chemical structure substantially different from  that of all eubacteria has been discovered in certain archaebacteria.  Instead of muramic acid, this peptidoglycan contains talosaminuronic  acid and lacks the D-amino acids found in the eubacterial  peptidoglycans. Interestingly, organisms containing this wall polymer  (referred to as pseudomurein) are insensitive to penicillin, an  inhibitor of the transpeptidases involved in peptidoglycan biosynthesis  in eubacteria.  
The ß-1,4 glycosidic bond between N-acetylmuramic acid and N-acetylglucosamine is specifically cleaved by the bacteriolytic enzyme lysozyme. Widely distributed in nature, this enzyme is present in human tissues and secretions and can cause complete digestion of the peptidoglycan walls of sensitive organisms. When lysozyme is allowed to digest the cell wall of Gram-positive bacteria suspended in an osmotic stabilizer (such as sucrose), protoplasts are formed. These protoplasts are able to survive and continue to grow on suitable media in the wall-less state. Gram-negative bacteria treated similarly produce spheroplasts, which retain much of the outer membrane structure. The dependence of bacterial shape on the peptidoglycan is shown by the transformation of rod-shaped bacteria to spherical protoplasts (spheroplasts) after enzymatic breakdown of the peptidoglycan. The mechanical protection afforded by the wall peptidoglycan layer is evident in the osmotic fragility of both protoplasts and spheroplasts. There are two groups of bacteria that lack the protective cell wall peptidoglycan structure, the Mycoplasma species, one of which causes atypical pneumonia and some genitourinary tract infections and the L-forms, which originate from Gram-positive or Gram-negative bacteria and are so designated because of their discovery and description at the Lister Institute, London. The mycoplasmas and L-forms are all Gram-negative and insensitive to penicillin and are bounded by a surface membrane structure. L-forms arising "spontaneously" in cultures or isolated from infections are structurally related to protoplasts and spheroplasts; all three forms (protoplasts, spheroplasts, and L-forms) revert infrequently and only under special conditions.
The ß-1,4 glycosidic bond between N-acetylmuramic acid and N-acetylglucosamine is specifically cleaved by the bacteriolytic enzyme lysozyme. Widely distributed in nature, this enzyme is present in human tissues and secretions and can cause complete digestion of the peptidoglycan walls of sensitive organisms. When lysozyme is allowed to digest the cell wall of Gram-positive bacteria suspended in an osmotic stabilizer (such as sucrose), protoplasts are formed. These protoplasts are able to survive and continue to grow on suitable media in the wall-less state. Gram-negative bacteria treated similarly produce spheroplasts, which retain much of the outer membrane structure. The dependence of bacterial shape on the peptidoglycan is shown by the transformation of rod-shaped bacteria to spherical protoplasts (spheroplasts) after enzymatic breakdown of the peptidoglycan. The mechanical protection afforded by the wall peptidoglycan layer is evident in the osmotic fragility of both protoplasts and spheroplasts. There are two groups of bacteria that lack the protective cell wall peptidoglycan structure, the Mycoplasma species, one of which causes atypical pneumonia and some genitourinary tract infections and the L-forms, which originate from Gram-positive or Gram-negative bacteria and are so designated because of their discovery and description at the Lister Institute, London. The mycoplasmas and L-forms are all Gram-negative and insensitive to penicillin and are bounded by a surface membrane structure. L-forms arising "spontaneously" in cultures or isolated from infections are structurally related to protoplasts and spheroplasts; all three forms (protoplasts, spheroplasts, and L-forms) revert infrequently and only under special conditions.
Wall teichoic acids are found only in certain Gram-positive bacteria (such as staphylococci, streptococci, lactobacilli, and Bacillus  spp.); so far, they have not been found in gram- negative organisms.  Teichoic acids are polyol phosphate polymers, with either ribitol or  glycerol linked by phosphodiester bonds; their structures are  illustrated in Figure 2-9.  Substituent groups on the polyol chains can include D-alanine (ester  linked), N-acetylglucosamine, N-acetylgalactosamine, and glucose; the  substituent is characteristic for the teichoic acid from a particular  bacterial species and can act as a specific antigenic determinant.  Teichoic acids are covalently linked to the peptidoglycan. These highly  negatively charged polymers of the bacterial wall can serve as a  cation-sequestering mechanism.  

Figure 2-9
(A)  Ribitol teichoic acid with repeating units of 1,5-phosphodiester  linkages of D-ribitol and D-alanyl ester on position 2 and glycosyl  substituents (R) on position 4. The glycosyl groups may abe  N-acetylglucosaminyl (α or β) as in S. aureus or α-glucosyl as in B. subtilis W23.  (B) Glycerol teichoic acid with 1,3-phosphodiester linkages of glycerol  repeating units (1,2-linkages in some species). In the glycerol  teichoic acid structure shown, the polymer may be unsubstituted (R - H)  or substituted (R - D-alanyl or glycosyl).
In addition to the principal cell wall polymers, the  walls of certain Gram-positive bacteria possess polysaccharide molecules  linked to the peptidoglycan. For example, the C polysaccharide of  streptococci confers group specificity. Acidic polysaccharides attached  to the peptidoglycan are called teichuronic acids. Mycobacteria have  peptidoglycolipids, glycolipids, and waxes associated with the cell  wall.
A characteristic feature of Gram-negative bacteria is  possession of various types of complex macromolecular lipopolysaccharide  (LPS). So far, only one Gram-positive organism, Listeria monocytogenes,  has been found to contain an authentic LPS. The LPS of this bacterium  and those of all Gram-negative species are also called endotoxins,  thereby distinguishing these cell-bound, heat-stable toxins from  heat-labile, protein exotoxins secreted into culture media. Endotoxins  possess an array of powerful biologic activities and play an important  role in the pathogenesis of many Gram-negative bacterial infections. In  addition to causing endotoxic shock, LPS is pyrogenic, can activate  macrophages and complement, is mitogenic for B lymphocytes, induces  interferon production, causes tissue necrosis and tumor regression, and  has adjuvant properties. The endotoxic properties of LPS reside largely  in the lipid A components. Usually, the LPS molecules have three  regions: the lipid A structure required for insertion in the outer  leaflet of the outer membrane bilayer; a covalently attached core  composed of 2-keto-3deoxyoctonic acid (KDO), heptose, ethanolamine,  N-acetylglucosamine, glucose, and galactose; and polysaccharide chains  linked to the core. The polysaccharide chains constitute the O-antigens  of the Gram-negative bacteria, and the individual monosaccharide  constituents confer serologic specificity on these components. Figure 2-10  depicts the structure of LPS. Although it has been known that lipid A  is composed of β1,6-linked D-glucosamine disaccharide substituted with  phosphomonester groups at positions 4' and 1, uncertainties have existed  about the attachment positions of the six fatty acid acyl and KDO  groups on the disaccharide. The demonstration of the structure of lipid A  of LPS of a heptoseless mutant of Salmonella typhimurium has  established that amide-linked hydroxymyristoyl and lauroxymyristoyl  groups are attached to the nitrogen of the 2- and 2'-carbons,  respectively, and that hydroxymyristoyl and myristoxymyristoyl groups  are attached to the oxygen of the 3- and 3'-carbons of the disaccharide,  respectively. Therefore, only position 6' is left for attachment of KDO  units.  
LPS and phospholipids help confer asymmetry to the outer membrane of the Gram-negative bacteria, with the hydrophilic polysaccharide chains outermost. Each LPS is held in the outer membrane by relatively weak cohesive forces (ionic and hydrophobic interactions) and can be dissociated from the cell surface with surface-active agents.
As in peptidoglycan biosynthesis, LPS molecules are assembled at the plasma or inner membrane. These newly formed molecules are initially inserted into the outer-inner membrane adhesion sites.
LPS and phospholipids help confer asymmetry to the outer membrane of the Gram-negative bacteria, with the hydrophilic polysaccharide chains outermost. Each LPS is held in the outer membrane by relatively weak cohesive forces (ionic and hydrophobic interactions) and can be dissociated from the cell surface with surface-active agents.
As in peptidoglycan biosynthesis, LPS molecules are assembled at the plasma or inner membrane. These newly formed molecules are initially inserted into the outer-inner membrane adhesion sites.
In thin sections, the outer membranes of Gram-negative  bacteria appear broadly similar to the plasma or inner membranes;  however, they differ from the inner membranes and walls of Gram-positive  bacteria in numerous respects. The lipid A of LPS is inserted with  phospholipids to create the outer leaflet of the bilayer structure; the  lipid portion of the lipoprotein and phospholipid form the inner leaflet  of the outer membrane bilayer of most Gram-negative bacteria (Fig. 2-6).
In addition to these components, the outer membrane possesses several major outer membrane proteins; the most abundant is called porin. The assembled subunits of porin form a channel that limits the passage of hydrophilic molecules across the outer membrane barrier to those having molecular weights that are usually less than 600 to 700. Evidence also suggests that hydrophobic pathways exist across the outer membrane and are partly responsible for the differential penetration and effectiveness of certain b-lactam antibiotics (ampicillin, cephalosporins) that are active against various Gram-negative bacteria. Although the outer membranes act as a permeability barrier or molecular sieve, they do not appear to possess energy-transducing systems to drive active transport. Several outer membrane proteins, however, are involved in the specific uptake of metabolites (maltose, vitamin B12, nucleosides) and iron from the medium. Thus, outer membranes of the Gram-negative bacteria provide a selective barrier to external molecules and thereby prevent the loss of metabolite-binding proteins and hydrolytic enzymes (nucleases, alkaline phosphatase) found in the periplasmic space. The periplasmic space is the region between the outer surface of the inner (plasma) membrane and the inner surface of the outer membrane (Figure 2-6). Thus, Gram-negative bacteria have a cellular compartment that has no equivalent in Gram-positive organisms. In addition to the hydrolytic enzymes, the periplasmic space holds binding proteins (proteins that specifically bind sugars, amino acids, and inorganic ions) involved in membrane transport and chemotactic receptor activities. Moreover, plasmid-encoded b-lactamases and aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes (phosphorylation or adenylation) in the periplasmic space produce antibiotic resistance by degrading or modifying an antibiotic in transit to its target sites on the membrane (penicillin-binding proteins) or on the ribosomes (aminoglycosides). These periplasmic proteins can be released by subjecting the cells to osmotic shock and after treatment with the chelating agent ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid.
In addition to these components, the outer membrane possesses several major outer membrane proteins; the most abundant is called porin. The assembled subunits of porin form a channel that limits the passage of hydrophilic molecules across the outer membrane barrier to those having molecular weights that are usually less than 600 to 700. Evidence also suggests that hydrophobic pathways exist across the outer membrane and are partly responsible for the differential penetration and effectiveness of certain b-lactam antibiotics (ampicillin, cephalosporins) that are active against various Gram-negative bacteria. Although the outer membranes act as a permeability barrier or molecular sieve, they do not appear to possess energy-transducing systems to drive active transport. Several outer membrane proteins, however, are involved in the specific uptake of metabolites (maltose, vitamin B12, nucleosides) and iron from the medium. Thus, outer membranes of the Gram-negative bacteria provide a selective barrier to external molecules and thereby prevent the loss of metabolite-binding proteins and hydrolytic enzymes (nucleases, alkaline phosphatase) found in the periplasmic space. The periplasmic space is the region between the outer surface of the inner (plasma) membrane and the inner surface of the outer membrane (Figure 2-6). Thus, Gram-negative bacteria have a cellular compartment that has no equivalent in Gram-positive organisms. In addition to the hydrolytic enzymes, the periplasmic space holds binding proteins (proteins that specifically bind sugars, amino acids, and inorganic ions) involved in membrane transport and chemotactic receptor activities. Moreover, plasmid-encoded b-lactamases and aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes (phosphorylation or adenylation) in the periplasmic space produce antibiotic resistance by degrading or modifying an antibiotic in transit to its target sites on the membrane (penicillin-binding proteins) or on the ribosomes (aminoglycosides). These periplasmic proteins can be released by subjecting the cells to osmotic shock and after treatment with the chelating agent ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid.